Perception of Print qualityMaybe a strange question; How good are your eyes?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conclusion.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perception of sharpness.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maximum DPI for different viewing distances at a certain visus It is easy to see that with good eyes, visus = 1.3 or above 400 dpi can be seen on a normal viewing distance. The maximum for people with less visus (0,7) is about 200 dpi. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The graph left shows how many megapixels you need to produce a very sharp 12x16 print for people with different visus, different eyes in fact.
At a viewing distance of 12 inch, you need 30 megapixels to produce a sharp 12x16 print for people with a high visus of 1.3 (20% of population) The same print with 8.5 megapixels looks very sharp for people with a visus of 0.7 at the same distance. (20% world population) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The graph left shows how many megapixels you need to produce a very sharp 16x24 print for people with different visus, different eyes in fact.
For a 16 x 24 gallery print you need 60 megapixel to produce a sharp print for the 20% of the people who have a visus of 1.3 Because of the larger viewing distance for this bigger prints you can also use something between 15-35 megapixel for the 1.3 visus viewers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The eye quality will be distributed among all people like a normalized bell curve. So it is save to assume that approximately 90% of all people are between a visus of 0.7 and 1.3. The implications are dramatically. When testing photographic equipment it is very important that the person who is doing the evaluation of print sharpness, is aware of his/her own visus or eye quality. A subjective discussion, about lens or print quality, without measured testresults, has not much practical use until you know the quality of the eyes of the testperson. Probably this is the reason that a lot of photographers are very happy with their Epson inkjet printers, like the 2200 or the 4000. However these printers will not give you more than about 225 ppi. The prints look beautifull but the same print on a Fuji Frontier with 300 dpi looks clearly more sharp. 25-40 percent of all the people cannot see the difference between an Epson 2200 print and a good 300 dpi print. Of course that is not a problem but it is important to know if these are the same people who tell you that this printer is really sharp. Maybe you have better eyes and can see a difference with a Durst at 400dpi. Kodak and Durst make some printers with 400 dpi capabilities. If you have good eyes than you will be pleased with the sharpness, crispness of the prints they can produce, but even a 300 dpi Frontier print can be very sharp. The digital camera testThe ongoing discussion about the quality of digital camera's. According to a testperson there is almost nodifference between a 12mp DSLR and a medium format. But of course this can be largely due to differences in eyes and visus. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison between medium format and Nikon D2x or Canon 1dsIn a comparison between a 12mp DSLR D2x and a medium format an imaginary testperson concludes there is no significant difference on a print of 24x32 inch. Yes the digital looks even better. Why ? The print is probably printed on an Epson 4000 with 200-225 ppi, the maximum obtainable ppi (dpi) with this printer. If the testperson has eyes with a visus of 0.7 (not uncommon) than the print will use 10-18 megapixel at a viewing distance of 12-16 inch (30-40cm). The 12 megapixel digital will deliver something between but will look very sharp at this distance. The medium camera has even more resolution, maybe 30 megapixel but will look the same for him. His eyes (visus 0.7) cannot see any difference, even at 12 inch (30 cm) distance. For this viewer both pictures will look completely the same when printed. So, completely honest he will report this to us. A lot of people who buy the same camera will notice the same (they also have a visus of 0.7). In the newsgroups you will see their unbelievable testing result with very large prints. However, when another person with a visus of 1.3 will see the same test prints the conclusion will be completely different. This person will report a big difference. At 12 inch (30cm.) viewing distance he can see 45 megapixel. The 12 megapixel of the digital will be much worse. Probably he will report something like ' medium format is much better than digital, digital can never compete with anolog etc etc.' The war in the newsgroups will start again.... Both are true and honest. 20-30% of mankind can see the same. The rest will never notice it .... you can read my comparison between the Mamiya 7 and the Nikon D2x also.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
How to measure your own eyes.You should measure your own eyes. You need a card with Landolt rings. You can find a copy here. Just print it and test your own eyes at 4 meter distance. Be carefull to print it the right size, no fit to page in Adobe. Sehscharfe is German for visus. At the eye clinic at Freiburg , Germany, eyeresearch, elektrophysiology you have a very nice electronic eye test you can do with your monitor.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||